a^ ^&> ^.*^:-,^ >- ^^:^ ^2«|-^ [Reprinted from Torreya, Vol. 7, No. 9, September, 1907.] THE DATES OF RAFINESQUE'S NEW FLORA AND FLORA TELLURIANA By John Hendley Barnhart As far as I am aware, no question has ever been raised con- cerning the rehabiUty of the dates given on the title-pages of any of the works of Rafinesque. His Autikon Botanikon, to be sure, is dated 181 5-1840, while no portion of the text was pubhshed until 1840; but this text was intended to illustrate an herbarium which the author had accumulated during the years 1815-1840, so that the meaning of the date he gives is manifest. About a year ago I noticed in the Flora Telluriana (4 : 27) a brief criticism of Gray's monograph of the Melanthaceae of North America, which was not published until November, 1837 ; * and this, of course, showed that Rafinesque's criticism could not have been published earlier than that date. A hurried examination revealed further internal evidence of the erroneous dating of the Flora Telluriana and its companion-work, the New Flora of North America, but the investigation of the subject was not carried very far at that time. When the last number of the North American Flora was in press, it became necessary for Dr. Small to decide upon the relative priority of Mesynunn Raf. (" 1836") and Catliartolinuni Reichenb. (1837), and this led to the study of which the results are here reported. The New Flora of North America was undertaken by Rafin- esque as a supplement to the works previously published by others upon the same topic ; and as a result of his labors upon J=: •* Gray, A. Melanthacearum Americae Septentrionalis Revisio. Ann. Lye. Nat. "^Hist. N. V. 4 : 105-140. N 1837. • 177 178 it. lie was led to uiuiertake tlie preparation of its "sequel," the Flora Telluriana. ilcalin^ with the plants of the rest of the world. The pages of these two works contain many descriptions of " new genera" of plants, so that the dates of their appearance are of considerable importance. As the books themselves are quite scarce, a brief preliniinar\^ account of them may not be out of place. Each was planned to consist of six " parts " or volumes, but was completed in four. Each of the eight parts is separately paged, and has a separate title-page and subtitle of its own ; and each is dated " 1836." New Flor.-v and Botanv of North America First part. Introduction, Lexicon, Monographs. 100 pages. 1836. Second part. Neophyton. 96 pages. 1836. Third part. New Sylva. 96 pages. 1836. Fourth part. Neobotanon. 112 pages. 1836. (This contained also a general title-i)age for the entire work, dated 1836.) Flora Telluriana P^inst part. Introduction and Classification. 103 pages. 1836. Second part. Centuria I, II, III, IV. 112 pages. 1836. Third part. Centuries V, VI, VII, VIII. 1 00 pages. 1836. Fourth part. Centuries IX, X, XI, XII. 135 pages. 1836. (This contained also a general title-page for the entire w^ork dated 1836.) Of these eight parts, the first part of the New Flora was the first to appear. It contained a dedication dated at Philadelphia, September, 1836; and pages 73-80 are occupied by a mono- graph of the genus Kuhiiia, dated October, 1836. These facts alone are sufficient to make one suspect that perhaps the eight parts were not all issued before the end of that year ! There is not lacking other internal evidence on this subject, in addition to the citation of Gray's monograph (Fl. Tell. 4 : 27 ; also New Fl. 4 : 103, where the date of " Grey's " paper is distinctly stated as " ^^1)7 ")■ I^'lora Telluriana, part 3 (which in turn is cited by 179 New Fl. 3 : 41, 51), on page 57 refers to Bot. Reg. //. igo6 (i N 1836 !); and on page t^-j to Bot. Mag. //. 3540 (i D 1836 !), which could not well have reached Philadelphia before the end of the year 1836. Flora Telluriana, part 4 (which in turn is cited by New Fl. 4 : 56, 57, 6^, 98), on page 124 cites Bot. Reg. pi. igjS (i My 1837). But, in spite of these references, I know of no internal evidence that the two works were not completed before the end of the year 1837. From internal evidence, too, it is possible to arrange the parts serially, in the order in which they were printed. This may be done by means of the exact citations, by page, of one work by the other; chiefly of the Flora Telluriana by the New Flora. The result is as follows : New Fl. I ; Fl. Tell. I ; Fl. Tell. II ; New Fl. II; Fl. Tell. Ill; New Fl. Ill; Fl. Tell. IV; New Fl. IV. In order to approximate more closely than might otherwise be possible the exact dates of issue of each of these parts, the series of letters written to Torrey by Rafinesque during the years 1836 to 1839, and preserved in the Torrey correspondence at the New York Botanical Garden, was searched, and the search was well rewarded, as is shown by the following quotations : September 5, 1836. — "I having leisure have resolved to be- gin to print my New flora of North Amer. by alphabetical order. . . . When this Work is printed, my botanical labors from 1802 to 1836, in America, will be better known." December 21, 1836. — "My flora proceeds very slowly & was even suspended awhile for lack of a compositor that could print Botanical terms ! . . , I have concluded to close the Lexi- con of monographs very abruptly, and give instead selected monographs & my N. Genera & species." This shows that only ten days before the close of the year 1836 even the printing of the first part of the New Flora was not completed. April 18, 1837. — "I wanted to surprise you with a great Botanical Work — my Flora telluriana ... to which I was led by my New flora of N. Amer,, but I could only print 2 parts or volumes. I. Classes & Orders. 2d. 400 N. Gen. my other engagts have compelled me to suspend for a while." 180 B\' the middle of April, 1837, then, had been printed one part of the New Flora and two of the Flora Telluriana. October 24, 1837. — "I am still going on slowly with my New flora of N. America and I^'Iora telluriana at once. ... I have circulated but few copies of the numbers published, wishing to surprise you and all Botanists when the whole shall be out ; but if you wish to see them earlier I may send you 5 numbers of 100 pages Svo each very soon, and more next March." From this it appears likely that a second number of the New Flora had appeared when this letter was written, and that a third number of the Flora Telluriana was nearly ready; or else that the two parts were nearl)' read}' to be issued together. January 10, 1838. — "My New flora or Mantissa begun to print in 1836 is still going on & altho' interrupted by my flora Telluriana & 2 works published this Spring (i. The Universe. — 2. Safe Banking) is proceeding as fast as correct exam, can allow. I wished to issue the whole work together ; but I shall be com- pelled to issue when half is ready 3 numbers of 100 pages as in Flora tellur. My 3d N. on the Trees and Shrubs or a New sylva is not quite ready." At the end of 1837, then, three numbers of the Flora Telluri- ana had been issued, and two of the New Flora, but on January 10, 1838, the third part of the New Flora was " not quite ready." March 20, 1838. — "I have long ago concluded 600 pages of my Supplemental Flora & Flora Telluriana or 6 parts. If I had not undertaken these 2 works together, the first would have been completed ere now, but will be ere. 1840." The third part of the New Flora had evidently been published since the date of the January letter. It appears that Rafinesque still intended each work to consist of six parts, and for this reason allowed himself until 1840 to complete them. February i, 1839. — " My 4th part or Volume of New flora was completed so as to give you time to go on with your flora. I also completed my Flora telluriana in 4 Vol. or 1225 articles. But immed' after begun & have concluded last Dec' my Synopsis of N. G. & Sp. of Trees & Shrubs of N. Amer." From this it appears that prior to December, 1838, both the 181 Flora Telluriana and the New Flora had been completed. The last sentence refers to Rafinesque's Alsographia Americana, which was dated 1838, and from his own statement above was probably issued in December of that year. The extracts from Rafinesque's letters show that few, if indeed any, copies of either the Flora Telluriana or the New Flora had been actually distributed until three parts of each had been printed (in the spring of 1838); but, as he says in the letter of October 24, 1837, " I have circulated but few copies of the num- bers published," we must give him the benefit of the doubt, and assume that he had distributed a few copies. Rafinesque's Bulletin of the Historical and Natural Sciences was an advertising sheet issued by him at irregular intervals from 1834 to 1839. No. 7, dated "Spring of 1838," is devoted chiefly to the two works here under discussion. He says in part : " I had long contemplated to give a New Flora of North America. ... I resolved ... to add the improvements on Natural class- ification. These last, however, increased so much under my re- vision, as to become a work by itself, and a companion rather than addition to our Flora. Both works were begun in 1836, and our plants would all have been published by this time, if I had not thus been compelled to double these botanical labors. I once proposed to issue the whole at once when completed, but this delay and others arising from different pursuits and labors, have induced me to publish the parts as soon as printed, and now that 3 parts of each (being half a volume,) are published, I issue this Bulletin to acquaint the Botanists of Europe and America with" them, " Each work is to consist of 6 parts of 100 to 120 pages, thus forming a volume large octavo of 600 to 700 pages, which shall be completed in 1840 or sooner. . . . The 6 parts now printed, 3 of each work, will be sold together for ^5." The dates of the two works under discussion, as nearly as they can be determined from the evidence here submitted, may be summarized as follows : New Flora Part I. 1836 (December). n. 1837 (second half). HI. 1838 (first quarter). IV. 1838 (late in year). 182 Flora Telluriana. Part I. 1837 (first quarter). II. 1837 (first quarter). III. 1837 (November or December). IV. 1838 (near middle of year). New York Botanical Garden. f6lK NEW FLORA NORTH AMERICA, BY PROF. RAFINESaUE. FIRIST PART. Introduction, Lexicon, Monographs. P HILABELP HIA *.' "^ 1836. :f^ 5)7 1 1\ T R O D. I. E X I C O :\, &Cy AND BOTANY OP NORTH AMERICA. BEING A SUPPLEMENTAL FLORA, To the various Floras and Botanical Works of Michaux, Muhlenberg, Pursh, Nuttall, Elliot, Torrey, Beck> Ea- ton, Bigelow, Barton, Robin, Hooker, Riddel!, Darling- ton, Schweinitz, Gibbs, &c> Besides the general works of Linneus> Wildenow Vahl, Vitman, Persoon, Lannark, Decandole, Sprenge!, Jussieu, Adanson, Necker, Lindley, &c. Containing nearly 500 additional or revised New Genera, and 1500 additional or corrected New Species, illustrated by figures in Autikon Botanikon. BY C;^Sr RAFINESQUE, A. M.— PH. D. Prof, of Botany, the historical and natural sciences — = Member of many learned Societies in Paris, Vienna, Bonn, Bruxelles, Bordeaux, Zurich, Naples, &c. and in Philadelphia, New York, Cincinnati, Lexington, &c. The Floral wealth in this wide land concealed. Will be at last by learned care revealed. PHILADELPHIA. PRINTED FOn THE AUTHOR AND PUBLISHER. 18 3 6. DEDICATION. To all my fellow Botanists in the United States ol North America, and chiefly to those who are endeavor- ing to complete and illustrate our Botany — I dedicate these pages, results of 24 years of observations and re- searches. But above all, to my friends, colleagues, or contribu- tors now living, and to the memory of the worthy de- parted, Elliot, Collins, Schweinitz, Pursh, Conrad, Brad- bury ... in grateful remembrance of their worth and kind help. . . . . D. D. D. Philadelphia, September, 1836. THE AUTHOR. INTRODUCTION. After many years of active researches in the continent of North America, I was medi- tating to write a new Flora of it ; but was long dubious in what form to produce it. To enu- merate and describe all the plants of this vast region in a proper form and natural classifica- tion, would be a very acceptable labor, but a very arduous task, to which, altho' I felt quite competent, it was not possible to think of, ow- ing to the expense of it, particularly if many figures were given. All our Botanists have shrunk from this undertaking, except Hooker in his Flora of Canada and Boreal America, now publishing by the help of patronage. Zeal alone does not avail in this as in collecting, other pecuniary means are required. It has been found more practicable and near- ly as useful by our Botanists to publish abridg- ed Floras on the Ijinnean plan, of which Mi- chaux and Pursh gave the example; while Nut- tall, Torrey, Eaton, Beck, &.c. have followed nearly the same path. Elliot alone has some- what enlarged his labor, and produced a most egregious work. None but such condensed or compiled works on our Botany, have been found acceptable to all and saleable; while the elaborate and learn- ed works, full of discoveries and ample re- searches, can only be appreciated by a few, and even often excite the envy of the learned ri- vals. ',^-? ^.•' i (\ ^ 4 INTRODUCTION. Under such predicament, I was compelled to decide upon a middle course; and I therefore undertook this work as a Supplemental Flora of North America, a kind of mantissa and ap- pendix to all my predecessors, avoiding there- by much expense and trouble in accumulating all the scattered materials and fragments alrea- dy published: altho' I endeavored to collect them whenever I had to frame some peculiar careful monographs of neglected Genera or fa- milies. The illustration by figures of my New Genera and New Species will be kept apart in mpt. to be sold apart to any institution or indi- vidual that wish to possess them, as well as my botanical specimens, general Herbarium, and original typical sets collected together under the name of my Autikon Botanikon. I have called this work, a Neio Flora of North America, and such it is in fact : a real Flora, although not classed by the false sexual system, nor even my own improved natural method, but arranged diflerently. I do not even know yet exactly how it will be gone through ; but 1 propose to commence by a sample of a Lexi- con to be contrasted with the manual Lexicon of Eaton, and go on with monographs of inte- resting Genera or Families, with a Sylva of my New Trees and Shrubs, a JSeogenylon or ac- count of New Genera, and a Neohotanon or compendium of new species. I may, however, deviate from this plan if needful or desirable, and I hope to conclude the whole by a general Index, both alphabetical and classified natural- ly of all the Families and Genera. While I was preparing this work, I found myself so often perplexed and involved into dif- ficulties, by the actual improper framing of Ge^ INTRODFC'TION. 5 ncra, that I was compelled to take up the suh- ject of Generic retbrm simultaneously with this new flora. This has greatly increased my la- bors and delayed the publication ; but vastly enlarged my field of botanical researches, now based on generic accuracy. In fact till lately most of the Botanists, both here and elsewhere, were perfectly satisfied with the Linnean Genera, and thought they had done their utmost when they referred the Lin- nean or new species, quite at random to those Linnean Genera ; often avoiding or neglecting to notice their peculiar floral characters, not seldom at variance with the Genera referred to. The labors of Adanson, Jussieu, Necker, Moench, Lamark, ifec. upon generic reforms were often overlooked or neglected. At last a better feeling has been prevailing, and the mo- dern improvers Decandolc, Agardh, Robert Brown, Lindley, &.c. have restored many of the old Genera, or further corrected generic no mcnclature. As I rank among these botanical reformers ever since 1808 when I first published new Ge- nera, and 1815 when I published the outlines of my reformed Natural Families, it was just and proper that I should resume these investi- gations, now that I mean to give the results of a whole life of botanical travels, discoveries and arduous researches. This shall then be done in a colateral work published at the same time, but kept apart, which I shall call Flora tcllu- riana or synoptical mantissa of 2000 new fa- milies, Genera and species of plants of the whole earth. There most of my generic and other reforms will be elucidated, and 1 shall merely refer to them in this N. Amer. Flora. 6 INTRODUCTION. Here, the new species of this continent shall be chiefly attended to. They arc often in as great a disorder as the Genera; many are occa- sionally blended into one, or improperly deter- mined and settled. To give their synonymy is not always an easy task, nor are the varieties to be overlooked. Many botanists mistake real botanical species for varieties or viceversa. In fact all species might have been varieties once^ jind many varieties are gradually becoming spe- cies by assuming constant and peculiar charac- ters. This is an interesting feature of botanical philosophy, which I shall properly explain and prove hereafter. This new Flora is very far, therefore, from being a compilation of former labors: it is quite an original work, chiefly based upon my indivi- dual researches and discoveries, during 36 years of botanical travels and exertions, whereof 24 were spent in North America, the main field of my scientific rambles and labors. It may perhaps be useful to give here an out- line of my botanical travels in North America, whereby it will be perceived that I have survey- ed and examined more States and regions than any other Botanist perhaps except Nuttall. Thus I was enabled to detect a great number of N«w Species, and examine many plants alive in full bloom in their native wilds. It would be well if botanical writers would thus detail us their actual excursions and ex})lorations. Some plants are quite local or have very nar- row limits of growth, others are only in bloom for a few hours or days. Many early vernal ]>lantsofthe Genera Dodccatlieon., Clhitonia^ Vernasolis, Viola, Peltmidra^ Cijpripedium,, &/C. can onlv be seen in narrow localities during INTRODUCTION. 7 the month of May. Others of the Genera Gen- tiana, Kuhnia., Ecllpta, Spiranthcs^ Aster, iS»oZ/